информационное письмоMANAGEMENT MODEL "EXPANDED GOVERNMENT": REGIONAL EXPERIENCE OF PERSONNEL TRAINING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31618/asj.2707-9864.2021.1.57.160Keywords:
youth, leadership, state, youth leader, leadership potentialAbstract
Developing leadership qualities in young people is ever increasing globally, a process which until now has not been critically analyzed. Leadership is believed to be so widely spread in the career and occupation discourse that developing leadership among the youth opens up unparalleled opportunities in new youth policy efforts, leadership development industry and multifaceted theoretical research of leadership. While researchers of youth leadership note suspended and individual types of discourse, we give them a more precise definition and offer the remaining three (small, independent and semi-independent) as significant for the account of interconnections between leaders, leadership and leadership development. It is necessary to answer the question if the current development of youth leadership creates a substantial leadership potential among individuals, organizations or society.
The article provides a region’s example of the Best Practice personnel training, developing leadership skills, establishing public, collegiate and consultative councils for decision making and building cooperation between the legislature and executive authorities of the Chuvash Republic.
The changing nature and ways of developing leadership competences have unveiled new exciting horizons and prospects as well as practical application opportunities for youth policies which will remain an important theme for researchers, politicians and youth officers.
References
https://www.thetonyrobbinsfoundation.org
https://regnum.ru/news/3357613.html
Decree of the Head of the Chuvash Republic dated February 20 , 2020 No. 49
Arnett J. J. (1997). Young people’s conceptions of the transition to adulthood, available at
Bang H. P. and Sorensen E. (2001). “The Everyday Maker”, in Dekker P. and Uslaner E. M. (eds.), Social Capital and Participation in Every Day Life, pp. 141-68, Routledge, London.
Cieslik M. and Simpson D. (2013). Key concepts in youth studies, Sage, Los Angeles.
Council of Europe and European Commission (May 2018), Perspectives on Youth: Young people in a digitalised world, vol. 4, Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg.
Crowley A. and Moxon D. (October 2017). New and innovative forms of youth participation in decision-making processes, Council of Europe, Strasbourg.
Deželan T. (2015). Young People and Democratic Life in Europe: What Next After the 2014 European Elections?, European Youth Forum, available at www.youthforum.org/sites/default/files/publicationpdf s/YFJ_YoungPeopleAndDemocraticLifeInEurope_B1 _web-9e4bd8be22.pdf, accessed 13 April 2019.
EU-Council of Europe youth partnership (2019). Glossary on youth, available at www.pjpeu.coe.int/en/web/youth-partnership/glossary, accessed 14 April 2019.
Farthing R. (2012).“Why Youth Participation? Some Justifications and Critiques of Youth Participation Using New Labour’s Youth Policies as a Case Study”, Youth & Policy.
Forbig J. (ed.). Revisiting youth political participation. Challenges for research and democratic practice in Europe, Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg.
Foucault M. (1972), The Archaeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language, Pantheon Books, New York.
Furlong A. (2009). Handbook of youth and young adulthood, p. 23, Routledge, London and New York.
Furlong A. (2013). Youth Studies: An Introduction, pp. 2-3, Routledge, USA. 17. Goodwin J. and O’Conner H. (2016). Norbert
Elias’s lost Research: Revisiting the young worker project, Routledge, London and New York.
Guilford G. (2016). Harvard research suggests that an entire global generation has lost faith in democracy, Quartz, available at
www.qz.com/848031/harvard-research-suggeststhatan-entire-global-generation-has-lost-faith-indemocracy/, accessed 16 April 2019.
Hart R. A. (1992). Children’s participation, from tokenism to citizenship, UNICEF International Child Development Centre, Spedaledeglilnnocenti, Florence, Italy.
Huntington S. P. (1996). Political Order in Changing Societies, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
Jones G. (2010). Key concepts: youth, available at www.ukessays.com/essays/sociology/theconcept-of-youth-so-difficult-to-definesociologyessay.php, accessed 3 April 2019.
Keer D. (1999). Re-examining Citizenship Education in England, in Torney-Purta J., Schwille J. and Amadeo J., Civic Education across countries: Twenty-four national case studies from the IEA Civic Education project, IEA, Amsterdam. 14
Kehily M. J. (2007). Understanding Youth: Perspectives, Identities and Practices, Open University Press, Milton Keynes. Macmillan Dictionary, Macmillan Publishers Limited, retrieved 15 August 2013.
Macmillan English Dictionary: For advanced Learners. – International Student Edition. Oxford : Macmillan Education, 2002. 1692 p. : ill. – ISBN 0333-96675-9.
Mannheim K. (1952). The problem of generations. In P. Kecskemeti (ed.), Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge, Routledge and Kegan Paul, New York.
Manzoni A. (2016). Conceptualizing and measuring youth independence multidimensionally in the United States, available at
www.researchgate.net/publication/304613252_Conce ptualizing_and_measuring_youth_in dependence_multidimensionally_in_the_United_State s, accessed 12 April 2019.
Merriam-Webster, retrieved 6 November 2012.
Niemi R. G., and Junn J. (1998). Civic education: What makes students learn? Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
Pleyers G. and Karbach N. (July 2014). Analytical paper on Youth Participation – Young people political participation in Europe: What do we mean by participation? Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg.
Quintelier E. (June 2007). Differences in political participation between young and old people, Contemporary Politics, vol. 13, no. 2.
Roker D., Player K and Coleman J. (1999). Young People’s Voluntary and Campaigning Activities as Sources of Political Education, vol. 25, no. 1/2, Oxford Review of Education, pp. 185-98.
Ryumshin S.A. (2018). Ideological aspects of mediation in advertising and PR communications//Communicology: electronic scientific journal. Vol. 3. No. 1, pp. 24-31. (In Rus.).
Schneider M. and Willems, H. (2009). Youth Participation globalisation and democracy. Coyote, Participation, Issue 14, March 2009.
Sharkov F.I. (2007). Political consulting
(specialization of the course «consulting in public relations»). Moscow: Publishing and Trading Corporation «Dashkov and K». (In Rus.).
Sharkov F.I. (2016). Visualization of the political media space// Policy. Political Studies. No. 5, pp. 97-107. (In Rus.).
Sharkov F.I., Nazarova E.A., Zhukov A.V. (2020). Digital literacy of the population and network communications: a sociological dimension//Communicology. Vol. 8. No. 3, pp. 52-62. (In Rus.).
Sharkov F.I., Silkin V.V. / under the general ed. Sharkova F.I. (2018). Theory and practice of mass information as a fundamental direction of communication. M.: ITK «Dashkov and Co.», 304 p. (In Rus.).
Silkin V.V. (2017). Information and communication management processes in the political space of society//Communicology. Vol. 5. No. 6, pp.15-30. (In Rus.).
USAID (2005). Youth and Conflict: A toolkit for intervention, available at www.pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/Pnadb336.pdf, accessed 3 April 2019.
www.jeffreyarnett.com/articles/arnett1997yo ungpeoplesconceptionsofthetransitiontoadul thood.pdf, accessed 11. April 2019.
Wyn J. and Woodman D. (2006). Generation, youth and social change in Australia, Journal of Youth Studies 9, pp. 495-514.
Youth Definition, available at www.dictionary.com/browse/youth?s=ts, accessed 2 April 2019. Young People’s Studies Magazine (2008).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
CC BY-ND
A work licensed in this way allows the following:
1. The freedom to use and perform the work: The licensee must be allowed to make any use, private or public, of the work.
2. The freedom to study the work and apply the information: The licensee must be allowed to examine the work and to use the knowledge gained from the work in any way. The license may not, for example, restrict "reverse engineering."
2. The freedom to redistribute copies: Copies may be sold, swapped or given away for free, in the same form as the original.
